硕士论文答辩有感

时间：2020-10-01 14:30:53 论文答辩我要投稿

硕士论文答辩有感

　　导语：对于论文答辩，我们有着怎样的感想呢?有着怎样的心得体会呢?下面是小编分享的硕士论文答辩有感，欢迎大家阅读。

硕士论文答辩有感

　　硕士论文答辩有感篇一：

　　09年5月23日，是我参加复旦大学工程硕士论文答辩的日期。

　　下午答辩，我上午演练了下PPT，然后到学校打探上午答辩同学的情况。上午同学讲9个人里面有1个人没通过，感觉还是有些紧张。

　　我们答辩的是有3个评委老师加1名答辩秘书，评委中两个是我们上课的老师，另一个是校外请来的专家。

　　答辩流程是：首先准备10分钟左右的PPT，电脑给你记时，一般页数在20页左右，有图有表即可，超过时间太多可能会影响老师对你的印象。剩余20分钟时间由3位评委轮流提问，让你记录下来集中回答，然后在电脑上记录问答内容。

　　我简洁扼要的准备了PPT，PPT的内容不是太主要，大致反映你的研究过程和成果就可以，关键是效果，字体要够大，版面要清晰，会给老师好的'印象。我那PPT是经过修饰过，所以被老师表扬。我的临场发挥一般，主要是靠PPT讲，老师提出我不够自信，要是能自由的讲解出来，估计会加分吧。

　　论文的评判标准其实主要还是看你的论文题目摘要和结论是否和项目管理专业相匹配，是否具有研究价值，这是判断你是否能够通过论文答辩的标准。写作的水平与态度是通过论文答辩成绩来反映的，当然PPT及参加答辩人员的综合水平也是区分你成绩的一个附加标准。

　　论文答辩的成绩分：优、良、中、及格、不及格五个等级。一般情况工程硕士很少能拿到优的，能得到良已经算比较好的，不及格一般也是有一定比例，拿及格成绩据说是有放你通过的成分在里面。

　　我们这一组答辩一共9个人，2个良，3个中，3个及格，1个不及格。我的答辩成绩为良，我觉得有两个主要原因：第一、我的论文部分内容是我在权威杂志上已经发表的，这是加分的地方;第二、我的写作相对规范，论文题目来自工作，选题符合项目管理专业的要求。

　　硕士论文答辩有感篇二：

　　(一)全力消化自己所写的论文

　　反复阅读、审查自己的论文。对论文内容要了如指掌。写好5-10 分钟的答辩陈述。陈述特别要注意以下几点：1.论文的内容、目的和意义;所采用的原始资料;2.硕士论文的基本内容及主要方法;3.成果、结论和对自己完成任务的评价，强调论文的新意与独创性。(下面附上我的英文陈述稿)

　　(二)物质准备：准备参加答辩会所需携带的用品：

　　1.硕士论文的底稿。2.答辩陈述稿。3.主要参考资料，答辩时虽然不能依赖这些资料，但带上这些资料，当遇到一时记不起来时，稍微翻阅一下有关资料，就可以避免出现答不上来的尴尬和慌乱。

　　(二)硕士论文答辩程序

　　1.研究生向答辩委员进行陈述(约5-10分钟，具体时间由答辩主席决定)。

　　2.答辩委员会专家(5位)提问，每人基本上有2-3个问题;

　　答辩老师一般的提问类型：对选题意义提问、对重要观点及概念提问、对论文新意提问、对论文细节提问、对论文数据来源提问、对论文薄弱环节提问、对建议可行性提问、对自己所做工作的提问、对超出论文范围的提问、没有标准答案的提问、对格式是否规范化的提问。

　　3.答辩委员会专家讨论、投票。4：1勉强通过;3：2不予通过。

　　整个程序大概需要一个小时。

　　good luck to you!

　　附：我的答辩陈述稿presentation

　　in academic year, i studied here for my med degree. a group of teachers in our college began a research program on different aspects of primary school english teaching. ms. huang, my supervisor, was responsible for the research task on primary school english teachers’ in-service education. she knew my interest in the issue of teacher development so she asked me to join in her research. because of her, it was easier for me to get the chance to attend various kinds of in-service education programs in the province.

　　in the same year, zhejiang province launched a project of improving teachers’ quality of primary and secondary schools in rural regions. wenzhou teachers education institute, where i am working took on the task of providing training courses to primary school english backbone teachers from rural regions around the city .as a part of the provincial project. as a teacher educator majored in english teaching, i was responsible for the whole arrangement of the training courses for these bakbone primary school english teachers.

　　in september , i finished my med studies and returned home. on 25th, sept of , i organized a training class for in-service primary school english teachers in rural areas and decided to take this class as my study subject.

　　enlightened by the socio-cultural view of learning, that is, teachers learn best through active involvement and through thinking about and becoming articulate about what they have learned, i arranged the whole training course to promote trainee teachers’ active participation as much as possible. for eample, i took trainee teachers to observe class and encouraged them to make a comment afterwards; i invited professor huang who guided trainee teachers to narrate their teaching eperiences in order to draw wisdom from themselves. in this sense, i named my training courses as “participatory training courses”.

　　the training course lasts for five days, during which, i participated in as an organizer of the whole training course, a teacher educator for one subject, a peer learner of the trainee teachers, and meanwhile, a researcher. the research methods adopted in the study are ethnography, narrative inquiry, case story method, interviews and so on. the data collected include field notes of classroom observation, interview recordings, teachers’ feedback journal, and discussion groups’ recordings.

　　the paper attempts to answer the following questions: (1) what kind of knowledge do teachers really need? (2) how do teachers get developed through learning in this in-service training program?

　　by making a narrative inquiry of the training course, i gained a better understanding on what courses satisfy the teachers’ needs and arouse teachers’ awareness of ongoing professional development.

　　the study provided some effective suggestions for promoting teachers professional development in the current frame of teacher training and teacher education. this reaearch deepened my understanding on the issue of teacher education., what’s more, through the research.it is beneficial for me to orgnize other training class.

【硕士论文答辩有感】相关文章：